InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1185
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2017

Re: j e d post# 282452

Wednesday, 05/13/2020 2:32:48 PM

Wednesday, May 13, 2020 2:32:48 PM

Post# of 700691
Referring to the premise of my argument makes me think you may know something about the philosophy of logical reasoning. If so, then let's break down your argument, shall we?

Your contention is that they never did an IA, and yet in 2015 they suddenly decided to quietly change the entire focus of the trial and move away from the defined endpoints? Is that right?

Are you saying that:
- moving away from the originally defined endpoints,
- verbally (unofficially) setting the new target as "long tail" survivors,
- and begging regulators to be lenient on trials that fail to show endpoint efficacy,
are not things that they did? Because I am confused about what, exactly, you are saying. Either you are saying they did not do these things, which would seem to be a rather bizarre position to take, or you are saying that they did do all of these things but they did them just by random happenstance, completely out-of-the-blue with no rationale or guidance.

Which is it, bro?

There is conjecture, and then there is reasoned conjecture. Your conjecture makes no logical sense. Mine does, and that, actually, is how you know the premise of my argument is 100-percent valid. Better luck next time.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News