InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 89
Posts 17470
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: j e d post# 282443

Wednesday, 05/13/2020 12:57:40 PM

Wednesday, May 13, 2020 12:57:40 PM

Post# of 704654
In Dec '2014 LP said an efficacy IA was expected in H1 2015. This would actually be the first IA as the 2014 IA did not happen as planned because the trail was instead resized.

When the trial was resized, the number of final events was increased. This increased the event count for the new first IA. And having that move to H1 2015 was very reasonable.

So the trial designe and LPs statement both pointed to an IA in H1 2015.

Since then, NWBO has never said a word on this subject. But oddly, all sh** broke lose shortly after.

Yes, no proof there was an IA conducted. But it certainly would be expected and has never been denied.

OTOH, your assertion that there was none in 2015 is total conjecture based on nothing.

I will stick to my view, that it was conducted and nothing good came out of it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News