InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 142
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: ilovetech post# 271877

Thursday, 05/07/2020 3:04:23 PM

Thursday, May 07, 2020 3:04:23 PM

Post# of 430373
i-

I would welcome HDG to find "1" case, just "1", that could rival all of the legal and factual errors committed in Du's ruling.

I am working on a longer post (a poster saw the draft x days ago) but: assuming you count Graham approach by Judge Du as a error … and it is not "all" … by CAFC

conclude that Thomson has clearly and convincingly established a prima facie case that claims 1 and 31 of the '099 patent are obvious as a matter of law. Accordingly, we turn to Muniauction's attempt to rebut this prima facia case with secondary considerations of nonobviousness.

(Muniauction, 532 F.3d at 1327–28)

So the POSA could assume that CAFC will see it the same way … smile

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News