Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[ilovetech]

SA6175, I am not a lawyer, but I'm not at a loss to understand the importance of neutrality. I don't see bias playing a central role for the board's anger, but rather a refusal to accept that
the concept of "fair and balanced" ought to be sacrificed, in favor of a rigid adhernce to neutrality.

I would argue, that the spirit of the law is weakened when one of these to overarching concepts are abandoned. I would submit, that there is more than subjective evidence, that Judge Du not only failed to apply the standard of "Fair and Balanced", but she also failed miserably at applying "neutrality". Evidence of the latter can be drawn from Judge Du's own words. I don't have the quote in hand, hopefully someone on the board can point to them. Something to the effect of referring to the plaintiff side of the bench while using the words "fishy pills..." it certainly presents an air of lacking "neutrality".

Then there's, I don't know, if it's bias, activism, ignorance, or a complete lack of having a moral compass of human decency, but I wouldn't use the word neutral to describe her words below:

__________________________________________________________________

Quote: More specifically, the Court finds that Vascepa is a commercial success even though it has not yet turned a profit, and that there was long felt need for a single pill that reduced TG levels without increasing LDL-C levels.

__________________________________________________________________


ILT