Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Hamoa-Mori-vital you give your view
You did the most brilliant assessment of the impact of the serious error of fact as to Du in respect of the Japanese study K-
The position is that there is serious error of fact by Du in Mori- yesterday’s post of HDG and Mitra debate this - Mitra-is an expert on these matters and is interpretation on Mori is compelling
There are on this premise not one but two serious errors of fact which Du relied upon to find obviousness. Can you consider and set out your view -
On this basis appeal will be won because the FC need not move on to consider procedural error by Du - although presumably it could in an attempt to reinforce precedent in the DC
Two threads of failure by Du persist
Serious factual error x 2 - Mori and K
Procedural error
If ever any appeal should be won it is this one
Your setting this out would be immensely appreciated by the board and indeed amarin/ Covington
Alm