Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[juslin]

So according to this person, Amarin can't refute judge Du's error in interpreting Kayubayashi in appeal because it wasn't brought up during trial, but no one knew how she would interpret the data until her final decision was made public. How is that right? Whether Amarin's lawyers brought this up or not should not matter. An error of fact was made in determining obviousness has to be corrected, can they let that glaring error stand?