I suspect it's a contract dispute with some of the original members of SDC. The original SDC purchase agreement price was contingent on meeting time-specific revenue goals. Maybe it's a disagreement with the interpretation of the purchase agreement. Maybe some of the original members were let go because they weren't needed anymore (like the scary people chuck saw at the CBD store) and are salty about it.
Look, it could be anything. Getting yourself tied up in a knot about a lawsuit that may or may not have any merit is pointless. It will get decided one way or another years from now. All the while, business will continue as usual.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.