InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2040
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/19/2018

Re: darkinvestor post# 1200

Wednesday, 03/25/2020 4:32:17 PM

Wednesday, March 25, 2020 4:32:17 PM

Post# of 1441
Where do I begin with this? There are many flaws with this conclusion unless you have insight that the rest of us do not? Do you know what the acquisition cost will be for UATG? What is UCIX paying? What are the defined considerations of the contract terms? How will assets be defined and qualified?

If you can not answer these critical questions (accurately) then you can not state with ANY accuracy what the pps or conversion would be. You dont even know what the cap structure will be at the time of merger and thats even if there is a merger with UATG! What if its with UAT!? Would make more sense from a regulatory perspective to NOT do merger with UATG. I could go on but its too long to get into the minutiae.

Claims of dilution are nothing more than frustrated traders looking to gain an advantage. No facts, THAT ARE KNOWN BY THE PUBLIC, support such a conclusion. If you have confirmed insight please share.

FYI: I have been saying this for over a year!