How am I comparing apples to oranges? Also, please be specific and clarify your remarks regarding companies keeping the AS the same as it was before a RS.
Also, please address the crux of my post; i.e. how can a reverse split hep the company with the SBA when the company, after the RS, would still have the same # of share holders, some/many of whom will still be OBOs?
And, if OBOs were the problem, why wouldn't the company ask shareholders if they would convert to NOBO status?
"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"