Solei Systems Inc. (fka SOLI)

[was16]

We have seen a lot of new MMs on SOLI recently.
We have also seen a lot of shares being traded and big swings in the PPS.

No one knows if there has been any shorting but given the up coming Name and Symbol changes any shorts will need to cover when that happens.

Just something to think about as we get close to April 8th.


sox040713 Wednesday, 10/04/17 07:51:57 PM
Re: AlanC post# 199090 0
Post #
199106
of 287406
Naked shorts have to cover when the CUSIP # changes, and the trading actions proved there were no large naked short positions when CTIX changed to IPIX.

"Both your transfer agent and IR firm should be able to advise you on the effectiveness of combating naked shorts by changing CUSIP numbers, reverse mergers, and/or reverse splits. Although the long-term effectiveness of these strategies is questionable, it may be useful as part of a larger strategy to deter naked shorting. After changing your company's CUSIP number, for instance, all existing stock certificates must be exchanged for new ones. All issued and outstanding certificates from old shares will no longer represent an interest in the company until exchanged."

http://www.hawkassociates.com/ir/white/shorts.cfm

"Changing the stock cusip number results in each share with the old cusip number having to be exchanged for a share with the new cusip number, which causes each short position to have to prove the borrow. Naked short positions would be unable to comply and those positions could have to be covered by purchasing shares with the new cusip on the open market."

https://groovevc.wordpress.com/2017/04/12/is-this-the-beginning-of-a-remarkable-short-squeeze/

"Seems from what I have read, a CUSIP change could force the cover of NSS positons if the change is done in conjunction with a name change. It is my understanding that the mechanics of the CUSIP change (with name change) would effectively prevent trading shares of the old CUSIP # and would create an entirely new set of shares through the DTC. By doing this, the DTC is forced to account for ALL of the old shares exchanged for the new shares."

"Because of the CUSIP # change, the MMs will be required to account for each of the old shares with the new shares. Because of the name change, it's important because it forces the DTC to play a more finite role by not only accounting for the old shares to equal the new shares electronically, but forces them to match a "new inventory" of shares that have been given to them from the CUSIP Service Bureau as the new official/approved inventory by way of the shares given from the company/TA."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82107281

Quote:
I stated repeatedly the shorts would not cover because of the name and cusip change and you know it!