InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 276
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/10/2006

Re: mymoneybgone post# 134539

Saturday, 12/09/2006 3:27:27 PM

Saturday, December 09, 2006 3:27:27 PM

Post# of 249374
mymoneybegone


Your description of people making decisions based upon the available information made me think of this well documented psychological phenomenon:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Availability_heuristic


The availability heuristic is a rule of thumb, heuristic, or cognitive bias, where people base their prediction of an outcome on the vividness and emotional impact rather than on actual probability.

An everyday example would be the statement: "Sorry I'm late—I hit every red light on the way here." Here the aggravation of the red lights made them seem more prevalent than they actually were.

This phenomenon was first reported by psychologists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman.

One important corollary finding to this heuristic is that people asked to imagine an outcome tend to immediately view it as more likely than people that were not asked to imagine the specific outcome. If group A was asked to imagine a specific outcome and then asked if it was a likely outcome, and group B was asked whether the same specific outcome was likely without being asked to imagine it first, the members of group A tend to view the outcome as more likely than the members of group B, thereby demonstrating the tendency toward using an availability heuristic as a basis for logic.

In one experiment that occurred before the 1976 US Presidential election, participants were asked simply to imagine Gerald Ford winning the upcoming election. Those who were asked to do this subsequently viewed Ford as being significantly more likely to win the upcoming election, and vice versa for participants that had been asked to imagine Jimmy Carter [Carroll, 1978]. Analogous results were found with vivid versus pallid descriptions of outcomes in other experiments.

Availability effects in lethal events

When asked to rate the probability of a variety of causes of death people tend to rate more "newsworthy" events as more likely. People often rate the chance of death by plane crash higher after plane crashes, and death by natural disaster as too likely only because these events are more reported than more common causes of death. Other rare forms of death are also seen as more common than they really are because of their inherent drama: shark attacks, terrorism, etc.

Denial as a reverse availability heuristic

An opposite effect of this bias, called denial, occurs when an outcome is so upsetting that the very act of thinking about it leads to an increased refusal to believe it might occur. In this case, being asked to imagine the outcome actually made participants view it as less likely.



It’s pretty vivid to think of Wave kabooming. Not so vivid to think of an ongoing process of decision by thousands of companies. Yet, that is where we are now.

That is why Seagate is so important. A cheap, simple solution that uses TPMs. Just what the doctor ordered. IT people will be able to sell their boards of directors and CEOs on that approach a lot more easily.

That’s why I have said we shouldn’t be too concerned whether we get 3, 5, 10, or 15 dollars per drive. Just get them out there, get people using TPM encryption, having to manage keys, and experiencing the gold standard of security. That’ll start a buzz. That will make the Availability Heuristic work in our favor, instead of against us.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.