Bioelectronics Corp (BIEL)

[Simpsonly]

Thank you - I have always seen this as potentially a major restrictive issue.

Quote: "after 14 years of mismanagement by the former CEO, that will impede the sp from running to the appropriate price"

Imagine if the current CEO would become extremely open-minded and internalize and agree that she was also a victim, all those years, of the former CEO management style? That her state of wealth is a direct result?

If she could 'get' that 35 billion shares @ $ .0009 is worth $31.5 Million and so are 7 billion shares @ $.0009, that would be a good thing. And, IF, the likelihood of the sp running into the realm of 5 cents is increased if the OS are 35 Billion instead of the current 62 billion with all notes redeemed, that would also be a good thing. So by 'disappearing 28 billion of the Whelan 35 Billion, there is an increase in the potential!

Removing the name toxicity is much simpler, just google BioElectronics for the evidence of that. Major focus of any turnaround is to determine what red flags there may be and remove them ASAP. These are the major red flags and both are easy to eradicate. That would be astute management and proof that prior DNA does not necessarily dictate current management actions. How refreshing that would be for shareholders and liberating for her! As I said, it's not all her fault, at all, she was a victim too. Highly complex and highly sensitive, but the truth!