InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1698
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2014

Re: joshuaeyu post# 187939

Wednesday, 02/26/2020 3:33:58 PM

Wednesday, February 26, 2020 3:33:58 PM

Post# of 232853
I'm not sure we ever confirmed the trademark aspect regarding Apple. I agree that 106C was outside of CIP and therefore could be potential revenue for LQMT. But I thought the Liquidmetal trademark was perpetual and not subject to CIP as it fell under a different agreement.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News