Set SAFE in the same fashion as Mr. Lichello did in his original thesis. He set his SAFE at 10% of the current Stock value. In his spreadsheets he never used a "minimum" order size but suggested it should be big enough that commissions weren't too big relative to trade size.
As I learned AIM I found it was handy to pre-calculate at what price AIM would generate an order (either Buy or Sell). This required assigning a minimum trade order size. Basing the order's size on a percentage of the current value of stock made for a discrepancy between the Buy order and the Sell order value. Making the order value a percentage of Portfolio Control solved this issue.
I've never fiddled with SAFE being a percentage of Portfolio Control but would think it would potentially create a slightly larger discount to the Buy target price than regular AIM.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.