InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 161
Posts 19454
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/23/2013

Re: gastric post# 285775

Friday, 02/21/2020 4:58:56 PM

Friday, February 21, 2020 4:58:56 PM

Post# of 346755
It would be just as simple to state the exact opposite with the same unrealistic effect. The most basic of business isn't such a 'all or nothing' scenario. A growth business doesn't operate in the same fashion as a mature business, and by default will not have all processes in place.

The whole concept of 'criticize or complain' in itself is disconnected. How does doing either, help the actual company. Its a basis for the ticker, not the actual company. At the company level, investors recognize the entire view. The ticker level is an ant view. The company level is what this is all about. Expectations it will be perfect is quiet unrealistic. There is not a single person who has made such claims either.

So, the statement is a very empty set, its not supported due diligence.

What is supported is a growth company, making it happen, continuously improving, increasing its business and brand.

It is easy for me to state all the due diligence supports a positive outlook, I never said 'perfect' myself and don't know anyone who has. I've even repeatedly laid out how FUNN is by default nature being a 'high risk / high reward' by default as it is a pink stock. I've laid out due diligence why I personally believe why the risk is greatly reduced for the range a pink stock represents.

I've further articulated out how risk profiles are an individuals liking and nothing wrong with choosing an entry point that suits there risk profile.

I've seen nothing to the contrary that has been supported.

I see a lot of discussion over the pps, but thats just a range for its duration at a certain phase, just like a pre ipo stock. However, unlike most preIPO options, there is a secondary market with its own framework on how to make money on this company at this stage. The true prize is so much more.

$FUNN