UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[AllinFun]

The problem here for me is:
If the valuation expert claims .28 is fair for both parties - then how does that help our case? If true value is 1.06 per subscriber then why would the MSOs not just continue delaying with appeal after appeal and continue raking in the 4x markup that they can just figure out the difference later and pay later if needed. Also pushes back their timeline to have to negotiate royalties for the future.

What I’m saying is - the MSOs have zero reason to book the liability and pay up if simple logic says let’s keep delaying with appeals while we eat up .78 per subscriber profit at the very least and just pay the .28 cents per subscriber later when we absolutely have too. And then we can figure out and negotiate future royalties later. Sounds like total horse poop to me.

If the damages are found to be 1.06 per subscriber then that is what they should be liable for with potential of treble damages being their willfulness to infringe.