Re: AIM vs Buy/Hold.................... As a follow up to post# 44113: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=153514055 Below are three runs of the broad market (SPY) over the past 5, 10, and ~27 years. The model represents Lichello's original "vanilla" model (with exceptions noted below): Stock-to-cash ratio: 50% Buy & Sell SAFE %: 10% Minimum shrs to trade: 1 (Note: In examples in the book, it appears this is 2 minimum)Exceptions:Due to the low interest rate environment that we've experienced, I've set return on cash to 0%. Buys and sells based on Next Buy and Next Sell Price, rather than evaluated at month end. No allowance for modifiers identified in this forum: Higher starting stock-to-cash ratio (Also endorsed by Lichello in subsequent revisions of the book.) 30-day moratorium between buys Increase and decrease Buy SAFE % after buys and sells Minimum buy and sell amounts based on stock value or Portfolio Control VealiesAs can be seen in a market that has historically gone up, Buy & Hold beats AIM due to:Starting with initial portfolio allocation to stock at 50% of total capital More sells than buys, resulting in large cash build up and a reduced number of shares held Returns could obviously be made more favorable using modifiers discussed in this forum. -AIMStudent investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2020/2/9/ubkhiAIM_SPY_5YR.png investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2020/2/9/itghaAIM_SPY_10YR.png investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2020/2/9/eqgrwAIM_SPY_MAX.png