Followers | 40 |
Posts | 1920 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 11/08/2011 |
Friday, January 31, 2020 3:10:28 PM
1. The much hyped "acquisition" of a building has yet to come to fruition. NTRR conveniently stated in their last press release that it was just a "hope" - not a sure thing.
2. "Neutra could grow its own hemp to produce CBD products, manufacture such items and distribute them all under one roof without having to rely on any outside sources." - except of course, "funding" from outside sources - the company has no cash and would have to create some serious dilution to pursue such a lofty venture.
3. "Being able to grow hemp ourselves in the state is not only convenient and cost efficient, it works well logistically with our potential Florida facility now under consideration" - huh?? How does having the ability to grow hemp in Texas become "cost efficient" to have a facility in Florida?? Last time I checked with Pompeo, Florida is closer to Ukraine than Texas
4. "... our potential Florida facility now under consideration." - I guess NTRR is still drafting that LOI in hopes to put earnest money down on a option to purchase a facility that they are already claiming is "ours" (who writes this stuff anyways??)
5. I am unsure if NTRR even meets the State requirements below:
During routine inspection or complaint investigations, DSHS, within its statutory authority, may detain products, including dietary supplements, that are labeled as or contain hemp, including CBD, and that make unproven health claims, such as preventing, diagnosing, treating and/or curing a health or medical condition. Products that are being manufactured or handled in a manner that creates a health hazard for people who may use it may also be detained.
Note: HB 1325 contains limitations regarding retail sales of out-of-state consumable hemp products. The products must be processed or manufactured in another state in compliance with:
that state or jurisdiction's plan approved by the USDA;
in the absence of a state submitted plan, a plan established by the USDA; or,
the laws of that state or jurisdiction if the products are tested in compliance with, or similar to those set out in Section 443.151 of HB 1325.
I suspect Vivis product does not have such compliance.
Recent NTRR News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/15/2023 09:15:27 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/14/2023 08:01:58 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/04/2023 08:21:12 PM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • BLO • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM