Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[luvthemtrainz]

There are several instances in this forum wherein a particular attorney who, presumably, being assigned the task of researching the dbmm fiasco, was referred to as a 'liar' and another that proffered the reasoning for said lying was because she (the lawyer) was 'mad' at dbmm. No such bending of the truth, incorrect evidence or other ambiguities were put forth other than the 'fact' that she was a liar. Do not such accusations warrant further investigation or, at the very least, some sort of link to the offending verbiage?