InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1527
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2011

Re: Tibby post# 27375

Monday, 01/13/2020 8:15:28 AM

Monday, January 13, 2020 8:15:28 AM

Post# of 29974
Hey vigilante. You are spamming for Barrick in MSX Board. Barrick 1997 properties, DO NOT go first or ahead of the rights of my 1996 first metallic minerals concessions in the history of mining in Chile.

Like MSX, Barrick when contracting HAS THE LEGAL OBLIGATION to deliver to me as its Chilean mining client, my mining property 100% ALIVE and must pay if I lost employment or benefits. Including all its fruits.
Law of the principal and law of the fruits. I own Barrick buddy.

That is why the Judge 2006 ordered TESOROS to die and my AMARILLOS to revive. As Mines Registrar approved 2011 title to me, never to Barrick.

Contracts in Chile are law for the contracting parties. Barrick agreed 1997 to bring MY AMARILLOS SUR and NORTE to fully constituted property.
Or go to jail if the contract was imaginary and fraudulent.'

Barrick constituted TESOROS concessions and let AMARILLOS SUR and NORTE to die 1997. They killed the title but not the mining right.

2006 the right was recovered by Judgement. In panic and fraud, Barrick sued the Judge to date as owner 2010 of TESOROS. That is PERJURY like everything else at MSX regulators institution or ABX regulators den.

2011 I re laid the titles and properly contracted with MSX while having Barrick bottled at TESOROS seized under injunction till 2018.

No retroactive rights are valid in Chile. It is all a fraud, now we are bringing down the purchase of TESOROS from UNDA under a "rendition of accounts" contract. Which means FALSE & IMAGINARY CONTRACT whereat HUL and Barrick fabricated RETROACTIVE RELATIONSHIP.

2911-2020 the criminal REGULATORS helped the criminals of BARRICK and SILVER WHEATON to sell the ponzi PASCUA LAMA and to steal the markets profits from our legitimate transaction.

they had to go to jail otherwise.

At the 18th Civil Court HUL denied he allowed Barrick to Trade Tesoros 2017, sold it to CMN 2018 and we charged all of them criminally 2013.

O $ $ A and his clients XSTRATA were illegally squatting against the Injunction at AMARILLOS NORTE and BARRICK re laid mining property three days before than me at AMARILLOS SUR - yet they owned it right? wink wink wink..... I left them TAINTED and without mining rights 2020. All

Barrick owned TESOROS via CMN S.A. when selling it to CMN LIMITADA for it to put it in PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL right?

CMN LIMITADA owned TESOROS 2006 when selling to CMN SpA right? CRIMES!!

Politicians were bribed against me and MSX by the BNKSTER & Barrick.

You want me to feed mining taxes to politicians or legally defeat the LEGION and send them to the pigs for the jump to the water?

It seems that you do not realize that is MSX who owes me the property NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND that is the Mining Option terms in Chile.

Barrick owes me the property 1997 when it was alive and contracted as we agreed either give me a TOTALLY CONSTITUTED PROPERTY at PASCUA MINE CHILEa as oredered by the Judge 2006 that will be true 2020 again, or BARRICK and CMN entered into SIMULATED and FALSIFIED IMAGINARY CONTRACTS which is JAIL TERMS VERY FAST AND FURIOUS for all criminals involved.

So go and wash your mouth next time you toss innuendo my way buddy.

Knowledge is everything. I am the owner and MSX owes me the property ALIVE and UNENCUMBERED as we are still contracted.

Better yet, the CRIMINALS Barrick and its regulators plus SLW and MSX regulators owe MINA PASCUA flawless and a lot of cash to MSX and me.

Check mate. Anyone who spits to heaven shall get it back on the eye.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.