Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Gotham Bay Group]

Your right. Quoting bits and peices of CFR's, documents, transcripts, etc. that seem to support an argument is staggering.
I am pretty confident our legal system will use more than the first sentence or paragraph from a several hundred word regulatory process. There are several processes within the process. Not one, but many processes can be met or not which can require invoking other regulations within the first referenced regulation. It gets far more complicated than a simple one sentence qoute. I wonder if people understand the difference between a commission and a commissioner? This is going to be reviewed by a commission. They will need a majority regardless of what is determined and if the majority is not reached then the decision will likely stand.
This is why I suggested READING facts not commenyed opinions or peices of facts.
Understand this tiny bit of reality, anything can always happen. This is why it's called speculative markets. You win and lose here on probabilities. So if someone bothers to read CFR's then possibly it would behoove someone to read results of cases involving those CFR's and the outcome...

And finally the last couple years has been determining whether to revoke. What would be the purpose of the case otherwise? DBMM was moved to the grey's not because of revocation. But for not maintaining the OTC Pink Basic Disclosure Guidelines due to delinquent reporting.