Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[MontanaState83]

HDG
Thx for your excellent summary. I’m confused by your following paragraph.

(b) We do not have all documents, do not know all arguments … but we know - re. the Hayashi study – that the examiner accepted as true Dr. Lavin’s opinion that the prior art did not teach administering purified EPA to patients with triglycerides of at least 500 mg/dL, which the parties now agree was incorrect, Defendants only seek to show that the asserted patents were issued based on factual mistakes about the prior art

The parties (including AMRN) agree this was incorrect? I thought it wasn’t verifiable that any subjects had TG over 500