InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 842
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2017

Re: Boilermaker1 post# 57524

Saturday, 12/28/2019 10:39:30 PM

Saturday, December 28, 2019 10:39:30 PM

Post# of 113416
Niocorp obviously knew of the meeting given Honan’s attendance. Niocorp requested the trade halt, as would be typical in a pending PR situation where outsiders potentially came upon “material information”.

These are facts. My question is, since Niocorp was fully aware that “material information” was bound to be disclosed at this meeting (positive or negative), why did they wait until after the meeting to request the trade halt? Proper protocol would have been to request the halt upon the start of the meeting.

I actually agree with Putzs theory in this case. When Sims isn’t busy twiddling his thumbs or serving his other companies he peruses this board. He may have seen Antlers post and they quickly put in the halt request. This should make one wonder why they weren’t on top of the “material information” to begin with. I think they found an opportune time to release fluff news and draw attention to themselves.

All of this ignores the obvious that the permit was more or less a request for clarification on county zoning regulations. Did anyone really think the commissioners would say they would would rather have a corn field than a “super alloys” facility?

In summary, FLUFF.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News