Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Gotham Bay Group]

Case postponed? Case was decided already in regards to DBMM. The review is not a legal proceeding. It is simply that, a review, but not of the case. It is a review of the sitting judge. It has zero bearing on the case and the decision unless it is determined the judge made legal errors. They do not reconsider any information except that. Did commissioner work within the confines of law.
The SEC is not DARPA. They have a website and answer the phone if you call. They will not divulge information about individual cases. They will however explain their legal and administrative processes and procedures. What has occurred is very similar to a DA losing a case in court, so I can see the confusion. In say district court, if the DA's case is dismissed they have a right to appeal which means all evidence is reviewed as well as the presiding judge's decision. If the judge, who is also a government employee just like the DA, is found to be in error then the case may be retried.
This is an administrative review and while the review board, judge and "Samantha" are government officials this is more akin to a formal protest than anything. Or to put it simply, someone is butt hurt. If you think the success rate of fighting revocation is almost zero, the SEC, if you choose to call will tell you review board disagreement with the sitting judge is even less. For obvious reasons. If they made a precedent here then they would need to admit any case tried under this administrative judge could be in error.
Not going to happen and that you can get from a phone call to them directly. I am assuming they speak with individuals same as family office's.