Fortitude Group, Inc. (FRTD)

[Imperial Whazoo]

Thanx, but rather than restate it, here are 4 posts I've made that delineate my perspective on IHDR. It is not hard to think that fundamentals and engineering and science etcetera etcetera ad nauseum make you money in stocks. I disagree. All I do is trade. It has been my business for almost 3 years now. I can tell you that a brilliant idea and a dime won't even get you a donut. I can not begin to list how many times I lost money before I learned that learning to read the charts is the key. I often don't even know what a company does. I had the following stocks on my list for today. I don't even know what most of them do:
ACLS, ELNK, ERHE, FAX, LF, LGF, MCZ, NPSP, Q, SIFY, SMDI, SNWL, SPZI, STEC. I picked these before market open this morning. Check them out. Believe me or not. The fact is that I use a proprietary set of indicators that I have invented that help me find trades. I cull the results looking at many more than I accept and I construct a tradelist for each day. I make my selections using charts.

So, as regards how I can convince you, I probably can't. Regarding IHDR, I believe that the most important press release is the one found at this link: http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/060627/101329.html. The next most important PR is this one: http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/061128/109413.html. A third is also quite important: http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/061012/106705.html. Apart from these three, the PRs are interesting, but these three hold the key to figuring out why the chart is poised to explode while the science is assailable. If you will take a few moments to read my posts represented by the links that follow, you will see my "thinking", such as it is. It is counterintuitive, but what it is, in essence, is a theory that I am satisfied explains the divergence between the questionable science and the story of the accumulation of this stock as depicted by its chart. Again, the 800 pound gorilla is the 40 million dollar award from the EU. As I see it, now that the unit has been certified and the Chinese have expressed interest, the EU will be hard pressed to come up with an excuse to not go forward. If delivery triggers access to the funding, then the product will have a firm market in both the EU and in China. If it is a fraud, we will know soon. The chart is telling us that there has been accumulation going on for quite some time. I choose to believe the charts, but I readily admit I could loose money. After all, it is called risk. So, take a few moments to see if you see anything other than things you can not agree with in my posts. I have made up my mind and I have taken my time to explain my reasons to others via my posts. My reason for posting at all was that I had a bunch of ideas that nobody else appeared to be thinking about; ideas that I think are persuasive. I think politics and the economics of government funded initiatives outweigh science in this case. Its as simple as that, and, as I look at the whole picture from that perspective, (once I realized that the driving force behind this stock is the government funding of a political initiative), the divergence between the shaky science and the message of the charts comes into easy focus. It is no longer inexplicable; it makes sense.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15237580

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15183181

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15152900

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=15127285

Thank you for your time

Imperial Whazoo