InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 661
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/22/2010

Re: sqrl post# 50797

Tuesday, 12/10/2019 4:42:34 PM

Tuesday, December 10, 2019 4:42:34 PM

Post# of 189628
That was not said by me. My last comments were something to the effect that .62 would, with a high probability, be the low on it's retest of .62 from months ago and that it would bounce or flatline awhile.

"They" weren't inclined to take it lower back then so coupled with the inflection point it would probably hold now. I also said in an earlier post that volume deviations indicate a bounce is coming but that's expected randomly anyway.

Also, all gaps aren't filled. A "runaway" gap is just one that may not. If the news cycle, and LP suppression, causes the dreadful penny a day avg drop then play the gap one penny above the close preceding the gap day. I've booked cash on that many times...a fave.

I haven't commented on this move. I could but it wouldn't be acknowledged because board egos must hype and be dominate for whatever reasons they themselves can't perceive and/or acknowledge.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News