![](https://investorshub.advfn.com/uicon/135840.png?cb=1687534643)
Friday, December 06, 2019 10:54:04 AM
JUST RELAX and be confident.
PINK IS COMING
SM raised only 2 ISSUES FOR REVIEW in her petition which will most likely rejected by the commission.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-116.pdf
Issue 1. Did the Law Judge err by failing to follow the standard for determining sanctions in a· Section 120) proceeding as set forth in lmpax Laboratories, Inc., Rel. No. 34-57864 (May 23, 2008) and Absolute Potential, Inc., Rel. No. 34-71866 (Apr. 4, 2014) ?
For this one, even a middle school student can understand that Absolute Potentials cannot be compared with DBMM as DBMM is a real company with business, clients, revenue, employees, IT awards, clients recommendations, is current in filings with audited fins since more than 1+ years and much more while ABSOLUTE POTENTIAL, INC. was
1. a SHELL,
2. did NOT file for 5 years
3. Thomas F. Duszynski is Absolute's sole employee, director, and officer
4. Thomas owned 97% of OS
5. Absolute Potentials Inc continued to struggle with its ability to establish and maintain "internal control over financial reporting
6. And many more points in below PDF
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2014/34-71866.pdf
Issue 2. Did the -Law Judge err by concluding that Respondent had cured its initial fil~ failures and was current on its reporting obligations despite Corp Fin's opinion to the contrary ?
SEC attorney Samantha has been in the case for a few months now but in spite of SEC Corp Finance giving approval to DBMM filings she continued to lied and even lied in petition that DBMM filings don't have SEC Corp Finance approval. See the text from DBMM SEC counsel letter dated October 3rd, 2019, which was uploaded by SEC after 1 month. REMEMBER ALL ? We have been requesting SEC to upload DBMM letters to Judge and SEC did not upload DBMM letters for more than a month. This is the reason. SEC did not want us to know that SEC Corp Finance has reviewed DBMM filings and has given their approval. See the extract from DBMM letter dated October 3rd, 2019.
"DBMM has, since that submission by Enforcement, continued its discussions with Corporation Finance and recently received confirmation from them that language that we had proposed was acceptable and remedied the prior deficiencies. The Company then, yesterday, filed those amendments with language."
Below is the link to DBMM letter dated October 3rd, 2019 containing above paragraph.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/apdocuments/3-17990-event-107.pdf
Samantha has to let it go else it will damage SEC reputation further
Good luck to all DBMM shareholders.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM
Bemax Inc. Positions to Capitalize on Industry Growth with New Improved Quality of Mother's Touch® Disposable Diapers • BMXC • Jun 24, 2024 8:00 AM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM