TJ...much can be said about the difference between an in person interaction VS a recording or transcript. My impression of the Judge is not only biased upon what I could hear him say but also the tone & inflection of what he was saying combined with the body language. My impression is that he sees what the companies through their defense lawyers have been doing….flatly though the Judge can’t say it but think he’s seen the blatant infringement & sympathies ae with us if we can argue a good case. I believe he asked the defense to identify valuation cases…the cases submitted by the defense were mentioned in court…no new cases listed…wonder why? Also think he did this to encourage serious negotiation’s (even as if I is a cover his own butt when a win is appealed as it is likely (with this much at stake) it will. Andrews wants no appealable mistakes or demonstrated bias on his part.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.