InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 222
Posts 13853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/12/2011

Re: THall post# 183152

Thursday, 11/28/2019 1:28:44 PM

Thursday, November 28, 2019 1:28:44 PM

Post# of 348167
Too much time and energy wasted on this topic so far and I have heard it all and provide links to discredit them many times so far. It is not worth my time to go over it again today and it is not fair to the great news about the company that should be the focus of this board right now.

The first days of trading will be here soon! Ohh nooo!

November 12, 2019 – Judge’s Initial Decision "This Initial Decision shall become effective ... within twenty-one days after service of the Initial Decision."

Turkey time! Enjoy the daysmile
****************************************
Knowledge is Power. Here is one proof that Naked Shorting happens and cannot be traced easily especially if the source is overseas/offshore.

DBMM was short naked right before going grey. Apparently, it was imagined that company could not come back... which it did. smile

This is both educational and eye opener folks. DBMM FOUGHT against all ODDS and WON the revocation and is uplisting soon! smile

GLTA shareholders!
**************************

A number of lawsuits that involve naked shorting have named about ten of the prime brokers as defendants, including Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch; UBS; Morgan Stanley and others. The DTCC has also been named in a number of lawsuits that allege stock counterfeiting.


The identity of the shorts is somewhat elusive as the shorts obscure their true identity by hiding behind the prime brokers and/or hiding behind layers of offshore domiciled shell corporations. Frequently the money is laundered through banks in a number of tax haven countries before it finally reaches its ultimate beneficiary in New York, New Jersey, San Francisco, etc.

...

Most of the large securities firms, insurance companies and multi–national companies have layers of offshore captives that avoid taxes, engage in activities that the company would not want to be publicly associated with, like stock manipulation; avoid U.S. regulatory and legal scrutiny; and become the closet for deals gone sour, like Enron.

http://counterfeitingstock.com/CounterfeitingStock.html