Awk...re Michael...With all due respect...well..I will not go there. You accused me of being devoid of logic in asserting that I have a concern with the "promotion". Lets take a look:
1) Qualifications: I asserted that simply because one KNOWS the technology better than anyone else does NOT make anyone QUALIFIED to be President and COO of a company. Does Carly know HPs technology better than anyone else in the company? Why was she hired to be CEO? She brought a wealth of EXPERIENCE that she developed by climbing the corporate ladder. She brought her own VISION and set broad goals for HP. She positioned executives in jobs that would insure that her directives would be carried out. In short..she had a track record of demonstrating LEADERSHIP. 2) Liberal views and PC never created a business? EXCUSE ME? Where the heck did that rebut come from? If anything...I would think that my view on this topic represents the CONSERVATIVE business mentality. 3)BOD...and my right to question their decisions: Given the number of shares that I control....GIVES ME EVERY RIGHT TO QUESTION A DECISION MADE BY OUR BOD!
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.