Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[SamuraiProgrammer]

AZ is one of the posters that actually gives links to back up his posts.

I can see no legitimate reason to disparage him above any others.

Would it not be more appropriate to disparage those who make wild claims without ever posting a link to an external document?

Would it not be more appropriate to disparage those who only attack anyone who thinks there are assets that should return to the releasing shareholders?

Or would that violate your agenda?

I believe there are those who tried to steal assets (if not the whole thing) of the Company, the Bank, and the Estate. I also seriously doubt that they have given up yet.

It is distinctly possible that the monitoring of this board is in place to judge what we will accept as fair and reasonable. This is why I no longer post what I think should be coming back. It has been long enough that the growth of assets has exceeded my expectations.

To be sure, it is also possible that even my original expectations were wrong.

So are you going to disparage me because I don't tell every stray thought remotely associated with WAMU?

I especially have to laugh at those who persistently tell us all that there will be NOTHING for equity. What do they have to gain by such talk.

1) The right to say I told you so to people they don't even know? Childish IMO

2) To upset people who know they took a risk? Antisocial IMO

3) Fulfillment of a nefarious agenda? Evil IMO

Concern is high.

Stress is high.

The moment of truth is coming.

Even the most convinced of us likely have doubts on occasion.

I take my cues from the actions of the involved parties (not this board). Those actions point to existing value.

Peace and Prosperity to all.