InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2016

Re: Belgie24 post# 33539

Wednesday, 11/13/2019 8:27:31 AM

Wednesday, November 13, 2019 8:27:31 AM

Post# of 47639
I'm sure they are all honest efforts on Paul's part. Those that speak with him regularly all comment about his sincerity, I don't have any reason to challenge his sincerity but at the end of the day it's irrelevant to whether or not gold is/was/or will be produced.

I'm sure yesterday's PR is also part of an honest effort. But when looking at the whole body of work objectively, you have to admit there are credibility issues when the same thing is being said repeatedly with no change in the end results - well intended or not.

Each scenario is always going to be "different" than the last. Maybe this is the scenario that will be the one that works, maybe it won't and we'll start the process over again.

The point of my post was to show a historical pattern of similar claims being made with no gold being sold by Mexus. In other words, we've been here before and haven't seen a payoff.

Can you provide any insight to my first question about why the need to restart the leaching process? Why are we not able to use the material that was being leached when the 30gpm Merrill Crowe was in use?