InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 122
Posts 17458
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2014

Re: Atom0aks post# 224027

Sunday, 11/10/2019 11:04:56 AM

Sunday, November 10, 2019 11:04:56 AM

Post# of 430591
A - so your logic for a 'no primary prevention' vote is because the primary prevention subgroup did not show statistical significance?

If so, do you realize that the trial was not designed (powered) to show statistical significance for this subgroup?

It's like saying that RRR for >65 year olds was only 13%, therefore the label should not include anyone who is older than 65.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News