InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 642
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/04/2013

Re: gastric post# 87136

Thursday, 11/07/2019 9:22:36 AM

Thursday, November 07, 2019 9:22:36 AM

Post# of 131103
The point is this: Voip-Pal is NOT Mymail, and their patents are very different - unlike what appears to be the potential for a claim construction hearing to fail in Mymail's case - Voip-Pal is exceptionally likely to have it's patents upheld with a proper hearing, as evidenced by both the fact that the PTAB conducted and awarded wins to Voip-Pal, not once, but 8 times - wins which did, in fact, already examine, weigh and measure the evidence that Koh refuses to hear. And the fact that the PTAB has opted to step in, in Voip-Pals case, in an unusual move, to intercede.

Secondly, the POINT of this comparison is taken from the application of LAW at the Federal Court level which concludes that EVERY litigant has the RIGHT to a proper hearing of evidence. Judge Koh, as is the pattern clearly, of various District Court Justices, overstepping her position and attempting to legislate from the bench.

It is shameful, rotten, and exceptionally dishonorable for her to do so.

This is Far from over. The possibility even exists that Karma might dictate that she trips over her robe, and breaks her crown. One never knows.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News