InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,983.99
(
-0.29%
)
US TECH 100
20,510.00
(
-0.03%
)
Dow Jones
43,910.98
(
-0.86%
)
Brent Oil
72.31
(
0.96%
)
Bitcoin
87,639.86
(
-0.32%
)
Post# of 96920
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Scruffer

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 21
Posts 2302
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/19/2017

Scruffer

Re: Long term post# 74348

Wednesday, 11/06/2019 3:13:36 PM

Wednesday, November 06, 2019 3:13:36 PM

Post# of 96920
Why would a consortium of MSOs list as SEP?

I guess I don't understand your postings.

CableLabs is a consortium of their member cable companies (65 total?); therefore, do not understand how they'd recognize ChanBond patents as standard-essential ones.

As previously written, believe best option is for:
COMM
CISCO
CableLabs
MSO 13
Other Cable Companies
&
All Cable DOCSIS 3.0+ Original Equipment Manufactures (OEMs)

to buy patents.

Then they can put them under CableLabs' or COMM's umbrella of patents (or share).

But if buy patents, ChanBond's part is over unless license with royalty.

But that introduces many other complications--Audits, public, private, sales, units, etc.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up