InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 237
Posts 10817
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2006

Re: Jeffkad post# 220199

Saturday, 10/19/2019 3:48:45 PM

Saturday, October 19, 2019 3:48:45 PM

Post# of 428806
Jeff...

It is certainly within the bounds of reality that MO does in some way effect the R-I results...What has been observed is a 7% increase in LDL-C in the placebo arm...That could partially be explained by a small reduction of LDL-C in the active arm...caused by EPA...Or because the mineral oil was inhibiting the absorption of statins...Either way the effect would be very small...about 5mg LDL-C and could not possibibly had a very big effect on the risk reductions..

The increase of LDL-C did not correlate exactly with the CVD event risk in the placebo arm..meaning patients with the highest LDL-Cs did not have the highest CVD event risk...

One way to test the MO question would be to run a twelve week trial using two arms...You could treat one arm with a fixed dose of statins...and another arm getting statins and and a dose of mineral oil which was the same (4 gms/day) as that used in the R-I trial...You could run the trial for 12 weeks..(similar to MARINE and ANCHOR...Then determine the difference in LDL-C levels between the two arms..

":>) JL
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News