InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 239
Posts 12059
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/14/2003

Re: biosectinvestor post# 247971

Thursday, 10/17/2019 10:29:13 PM

Thursday, October 17, 2019 10:29:13 PM

Post# of 689398
Another reason I think this could be ideal is that after surgery, if mets exist, it can take months, or years before they grow to a mass where they can be detected. They may be possible to remove, but with pretreatment with Direct, then post surgery treatment with L, hopefully they'll never develop. I don't know how large a mass has to be to target it for injection with Direct, but treatment with L can continue as long as you have a viable supply of the vaccine.

I'm not a Dr. This is purely a layman's theory on my part, but it would seem logical. A relative had a cancer removed where the Doctor's frankly believed it would reoccur. Their intent was to find new masses when they were the size of a grain of rice and remove them. New experimental chemo has been applied, and to date no masses have needed to be removed, at least not yet. My advice to anyone with something that conventional medicine doesn't have an answer for is do the experimental, don't accept that nothing can be done but what already approved, search for what isn't, especially if it also provides a good quality of life.

Gary
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News