InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 980
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/20/2019

Re: None

Thursday, 10/17/2019 6:01:09 PM

Thursday, October 17, 2019 6:01:09 PM

Post# of 426487
Just curious as to what are your thoughts on why the FDA selected the Endocrinologic & Metabolic Committee (https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/human-drug-advisory-committees/endocrinologic-and-metabolic-drugs-advisory-committee) to review Vascepa and not the Cardiovascular and Renal Committee (https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/human-drug-advisory-committees/cardiovascular-and-renal-drugs-advisory-committee)?

Does it have to do with how broad of a label for diabetics and the other cardiovascular risk factors cited below?

The Federal Register (FR) notice for the November 14, 2019 EMDAC meeting contains FDA’s summary of
a proposed indication statement based on REDUCE-IT results for use of Vascepa® (icosapent ethyl)
capsules to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, as an adjunct to statin therapy in adult patients with
elevated triglycerides levels (135 mg/dL or greater) and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Language proposed by Amarin for an expanded label for Vascepa is intended to reflect the patient
population studied in REDUCE-IT and the results of REDUCE-IT, in particular:
• Reduction in five-point MACE (MI,stroke, CV death, revascularization, hospitalization for unstable
angina),
• Not a replacement for statin therapy but as an incremental and separate prescription treatment
option for patients at risk for CV events,
• CV risk identified beyond cholesterol management to include patients with elevated TG levels and
other CV risk factors,
• TG levels of >135 mg/dL specified as that is the population studied in REDUCE-IT as elevated TG
levels are a good identifier of risk (it being recognized that lowering TG levels alone are not
validated as an FDA-approved surrogate for CV risk reduction, REDUCE-IT is not designed to
validate TGs as a surrogate and the effects of Vascepa go beyond TGlowering),
• Other CV risk factors are well understood by medical professionals and further delineation ofsuch
risks in the label is likely to clutter the label, confuse patients and lead to unnecessary insurancerelated issues that we do not believe should be encouraged for a cost-effective drug like Vascepa,
and
• Emphasis in the label should be on 4 grams per day (2 grams twice daily).
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News