InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[j70k]

O'DOG-The 10k standardized response is basically a CYA disclosure but if the order in which they listed the basic objections to licensing with IDCC is any indication of the hurdles we must still cross, then I DON'T THINK WE ARE EVEN CLOSE TO CLOSING ANY BIG OEM'S.If we have to go thru a process to prove to all the unsigned major players that we possess 3g patents that are necessary for the functioning of 3g technology,then being on the standards board didn't mean a thing,and we are being played big time.The reluctance of the big boys to acknowledge our ipr and pay for it,just because there is no cross licensing possibility,has got to come to a screeching halt.We have been lead to believe that we have the goods,and I still believe that we do,but there must be a definitive way to spell out very clearly exactly what technology is being used by the unsigned with specific reference to a patent# so that all can see that the patent(s) is being infringed.I've felt that we were beyond this stage and that it was only a matter of coming up with a mutually agreed upon rate or package-to me that is what negotiating means.Otherwise the disclaimer in the 10k,just may be the ultimate rationalization why we are bought out.