UAM - I was under the impression that this board was for discussion of HRCT. OC voiced his position and remained on topic. Your response is a personal attack on OC instead of being a response to his comments. Name calling "Classic basher, scumbag" is what was supposed to be deleted from this board.
I don't agree with OC's emphasis on what I consider to be minor irrelevant points but they exist and calling him names will not make them go away.
I don't know why different SEC filings contain information that seems conflicting and don't care since it doesn't make any differece which one is correct. Dr. Phan doesn't write these filings but should be reading them before signing off. Since this bio info is generally boilerplate he probably skims over it without checking for accuracy. So hold him accountable but don't make a mountain out of a molehill.
Doug MacGill wrote things that were sometimes inaccurate, not consistant, and often showed a personal bias against Dr. Phan while at the same time praising the subsidiaries. At any rate his web publisher ran out of money and is now defunct and Doug was out of a job.
As Mark pointed out, performance is what will tell the tale. If HRCT manages to show continously improving revenues, completes a spinoff, and demonstrates the ability to complete the projects it begins, then the negative points will not mean much.
HRCT has come a long way from being a shell 2 years ago and the next 10Q should show solid revenues. It is a growing company and will have some setbacks along the way. I own two small well-established companies and both occasionally still have problems that have to be addressed. It is the nature of business in a competitive world.
