Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[Bakerco]

I have to disagree with you.

I thought DECN's attorney's argument had a lot of conviction, was extremely clear, and was easy to follow. While, I do think the judges pressed him a bit, DECN's attorney did a very fine job at answering the questions. We are potentially talking about a lot of money being awarded to DECN, the judges have every right to ask tough questions. Maybe playing devil's advocate a bit? I like how we did.

I thought Lifescan's attorney was a bit weak to be honest. His voice did not convey the conviction that DECN's attorney's voice did, and relied on the court's previous rulings to demonstrate his point. Seemed like he had to stand on the shoulders of other people's work to make his point. Not saying that it's bad, but seemed like a weaker argument.

I think DECN has some money coming to them and that's why the judges pressed DECN's attorney so much. They wanted to make sure before they make a ruling in DECN's favor which involves a lot money.

Good luck everyone.