InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5213
Posts 24106
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: Musky Hunter post# 42572

Tuesday, 09/03/2019 1:46:52 PM

Tuesday, September 03, 2019 1:46:52 PM

Post# of 44155
Musky Hunter, respectfully, with that ZICX thought...

The way how it's worded, it's debatable if the $40,000 Net Income per acre is after the 20% has been factored in or out. The $40,000 could be their Net Income representing their 80% of the Net Income after the fact.

I feel different about the 30% that you speak of. I can't give you or agree with you regarding the 30% because I have to presume that these guys know what they have and what they are talking about until they show otherwise. I think if the 30% of extra costs existed, for now, I'm trusting that they would had added such into their numbers.

However, let's presume as a worst case scenario, I'll give you the 20% reduction of that ZICX valuation thought.

So... as a worst case, from my view, even if the 20% was not factored in, the the valuation from the hemp grow operations would put a valuation for ZICX at the numbers below:

.148 Per Share - 20% = .1184 ZICX Valuation

to

.56 Per Share - 20% = .448 ZICX Valuation

v/r
Sterling

Exit Strategy & Etiquette Thoughts for a Stock
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=128822531
I never give investing advice; only my beliefs for risks in a stock.