I don't need to see the actual document, Franky.
You see, Nick and the kind folks at VEND have already told me what it provides:
1. From the 10-K (emphasis supplied) -
"Five -time Major Golf Champion Phil Mickelson and his career-long business manager and business partner Steve Loy entered into a business relationship with Reis & Irvy’s to become franchisees in San Diego, and to cooperate in certain promotional activities for the promotion of the Company, including the Reis & Irvy’s brand in exchange for a reduced purchase price for their robots."
2. From the franchise disclosure document -
“Mr. Mickelson, through press releases, has agreed to speak to his experience in dealing with us...”
Are you suggesting that I should not rely upon the company's statements that I have quoted above? Or are you trying to argue that the above-described agreements do not constitute agreeing to be a spokesperson? Feel free to make yourself clear.
As a lawyer might put it in a cross-examination of Nick Yates: Which was it? Were you lying then or are you lying now?
Remember how you said your purpose here was to provide facts? I just provided you some facts, but you have only characterized a document that you claim to be privy to that you know I can't see, and your characterization is in conflict with the company's statements. Since you are affiliated with the company to the extent necessary to provide yourself access to the confidential agreement with Mickelson, you are in a position to tell us what wriggle room is available to argue that Phil is not a spokesperson, but you haven't (because you can't reasonably defend that position).
This also makes me wonder why you and Nick find it so important to provide some distance for Phil from VEND. He must have asked you, as a dear friend, not to associate him with VEND any more than you already regrettably have.
AI
