InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 677
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2017

Re: rakp post# 5005

Saturday, 07/20/2019 7:24:13 AM

Saturday, July 20, 2019 7:24:13 AM

Post# of 5508
Because this is still in the court system as a custodianship case. The court wants to know what's going on regarding filings, etc. I think I will call the court Monday and ask a few questions. If necessary, after speaking with the court, I'll quickly send a certified letter regarding some questions and issues. It makes no sense whatsoever that the same person who's been in charge the last few years and ran the company down to a zombie ticker was put in charge. Why do the custodianship in the first place. Maybe it was just a way to grab the entire shell and eliminate Mark Bayliss from the record. I don't know but considering the lack of news, even the most basic of shareholder communication, it seems as though it's time to ask some questions. The 2 guys running the company who took custodianship have not done this before and apparently had the intention all along of keeping Greg Steinke in charge. From my point of view, this was an elaborate pump and dump. Steinke obviously has no regard for the shareholders, never did. Very odd situation. Stinks big time. So sad for us. Someone should look into whether Steinke and Skinny made money on the run up in price after custodianship was granted.