Home > Boards > US Listed > Biotechs > Amarin Corp. PLC ADS (AMRN)

dmlcento,Thank you for an excellent example:

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
MedResCollab Member Profile
 
Followed By 2
Posts 211
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/19
160x600 placeholder
Clinical Data and Other Research Results Regarding VASCEPA® (Icosapent Ethyl) and Its Unique Active Ingredient to Be Present... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 5/4/2021 7:00:00 AM
Amarin reports decline in Q1 revenue ahead of European launch of VAZKEPA Seeking Alpha - 4/29/2021 7:31:32 AM
Quarterly Report (10-q) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 4/29/2021 6:36:55 AM
Amarin EPS beats by $0.07, misses on revenue Seeking Alpha - 4/29/2021 6:16:54 AM
Amarin Reports First Quarter 2021 Financial Results and Provides Business Update GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/29/2021 6:10:00 AM
Amarin Announces Planned Retirement of Joseph T. Kennedy, EVP, General Counsel GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/29/2021 6:00:00 AM
Amarin Q1 2021 Earnings Preview Seeking Alpha - 4/28/2021 1:06:54 PM
UK approves Amarin's Vazkepa for cardiovascular risk reduction Seeking Alpha - 4/22/2021 11:22:31 AM
Amarin Receives Great Britain Marketing Authorization for VAZKEPA from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agenc... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/22/2021 10:53:02 AM
Amarin to Report First Quarter Results and Host Conference Call on April 29, 2021 GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/20/2021 6:05:00 AM
VASCEPA® (Icosapent Ethyl) Reported to Impact Vulnerable Coronary Plaque Features in New Analyses of EVAPORATE Study Present... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/17/2021 9:50:00 AM
Amarin: Could the New CEO Help Vazkepa’s European Push? TipRanks - 4/13/2021 3:05:37 PM
Amarin falls as new CEO may mean M&A less likely in the near term Seeking Alpha - 4/13/2021 8:08:18 AM
Amarin CEO John Thero to retire Seeking Alpha - 4/12/2021 4:36:21 PM
Amarin Announces CEO Succession Plan GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/12/2021 4:30:00 PM
Amarin Commences Commercial Initiatives for VAZKEPA in European Union Following Recent Regulatory Approval for Cardiovascular... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 4/6/2021 6:05:00 AM
Amarin wins EU approval for icosapent ethyl to treat cardiovascular patients Seeking Alpha - 3/30/2021 7:42:41 AM
Amarin Receives European Commission (EC) Approval for VAZKEPA to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk GlobeNewswire Inc. - 3/30/2021 6:24:23 AM
Amarin announces clinical recommendations for Vascepa in Canada and Egypt Seeking Alpha - 3/29/2021 10:33:15 AM
Fifteen Medical Societies Now Recommend Icosapent Ethyl to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk, Further Supporting that VASCEPA® is R... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 3/29/2021 7:00:00 AM
Nextech AR (OTCQB: NEXCF) Doubling Sales - Emerging Growth Report InvestorsHub NewsWire - 3/24/2021 6:45:37 AM
HLS Therapeutics highlights promising VASCEPA data analysis Seeking Alpha - 3/17/2021 11:55:39 AM
VASCEPA® (Icosapent Ethyl) Found in Prespecified and Post Hoc Analyses to Significantly Reduce Stroke in At-Risk Patients in... GlobeNewswire Inc. - 3/17/2021 11:30:00 AM
Amarin Q4 results led by strong Vascepa sales Seeking Alpha - 2/25/2021 9:48:43 AM
Current Report Filing (8-k) Edgar (US Regulatory) - 2/25/2021 6:07:01 AM
MedResCollab   Wednesday, 07/10/19 09:08:55 AM
Re: dmlcento post# 200738
Post # of 339101 
dmlcento,

Thank you for an excellent example:

Quote:
If you tell me that right now it is Thursday in St. Louis, MO, that is incorrect and you can argue all day that it is correct, but that doesn't make it so. Right now it is Wednesday in St. Louis, MO. End of argument. -dmlcento



How would the two making these differing arguments (1. it is now Thursday in MO; 2. no, it is now Wednesday in MO) substantiate either claim? With evidence. What evidence? An established medium that we all know is reliable and scientifically valid. Such as:

https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/?country=1

This would provide exceptionally strong evidence that argument 2. above is correct.

Would spending all of one's time trying to ascertain who the person is and their qualifications that made statement no. 1 help disprove statement no. 1? What if we got the FBI involved and they ran an exhaustive background check on arguer of point no. 1, and we determined that they were a meteorologist, and purveyor of argument no. 2 was a bathroom remodeler? Would that de facto negate the accuracy of, or evidence to support argument no.2 in favor of argument no.1?

Point made, we hope. And so, with Amarin, our arguments are valid or invalid based on the strength of the evidence we present along with our claims, not "who we are."

Regards,
-MRC

...
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgNext 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist
Consent Preferences