InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 24
Posts 4673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/25/2006

Re: JAG69 post# 174014

Thursday, 06/13/2019 1:18:54 PM

Thursday, June 13, 2019 1:18:54 PM

Post# of 232864
We both agree. I believe the main factor here was the observation of the huge huge float vs the income YOY, by the posters first post that led to the second post and my reply. The issue is not the r/s . The issue is the obstacle float to someone who is thinking of dollar increases in the pps vs nickel and dime increases that most here are looking for to get them out of the rabbit hole.

In other words it will take a very very large industrial whale of a potential contract to move a billion shares above $1.00. But just a whisper to pop it to a quarter a share.

I don’t recall many r/‘s being successful.

Without pr and any progress updates between reports there is no beef to move the pps nor any reason for a r/s. If you’re not volume trading 100 million now, and trading only 500 thousand to a million, an r/s will reverse that volume 50 thousand to 100 thousand a day. And for what to impress whom? Lipstick on a pig is still a pig.

I could be wrong, but I believe the poster was trying to solve the float issue and not really desiring a r/s.

And as always my opinions are always worth less than the pps of LQMT.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News