InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24517
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: sentiment_stocks post# 232859

Wednesday, 06/12/2019 12:49:31 AM

Wednesday, June 12, 2019 12:49:31 AM

Post# of 693663
I’m reading Avii’s posts perfectly correctly. You’re not following what actually happened and what was an intentional effort to muddy the waters on this exact point. It started with Adam Feuerstein, and the continued through 2016, and 2017.

When faced with the court decision, the shorts were shut up for some time, but now they are arguing, incorrectly that the 2017 case only referred to discussions of an IA for efficacy in 2013 or 2014, but not the references made in 2015.

This is absolutely incorrect and a lie. Not you, but others, and as I pointed out previously, the problem with some of the discussions that longs have had with the shorts is they adopt the words and ideas of the shorts because they will link to a page of a presentation, and then make a misrepresentation about the court case not pertaining to those references by LP, etc.

That is a mix of truth, the link, and untruth, the idea that the ruling did not pertain to those references too, when they were raised in court, and the ruling is as of March 31, 2017.

I don’t know how to get clearer than that, except to say, I’m not going to help the shorts come up with their next attempt to muddy the waters... which is what these little debates frequently do.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News