InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 417
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2018

Re: staticmirror79 post# 21762

Sunday, 06/02/2019 2:05:08 PM

Sunday, June 02, 2019 2:05:08 PM

Post# of 43784
Hi Static

Another interesting study, around 3000 patients in 50 years
To be able to use as benchmark to CVM study, the first criteria to consider would be, in my opinion, the cancer stage, the second the dates : the sooner the better as they introduced more systematic S-CRT
So the interesting table is table 3.
Stage shall be "regional"
So here's how it went :

1960-1969 (%) 1970-1979 (%) 1980-1989 (%) 1990-1999 (%) 2000-2009 (%)

Regional 28.9 32.6 27.8 38.5 31.2


As you can notice soc is disastrous, never above 40% at Y5, most time around 30% and best years were 90/99 with 38.5

Well, while SOC OS might have improved in the 2011/2016 period, it is still probably as bad as possible and below 50%. This kind of bad prognosis should balance countries were OS is better in our study.

Room for optimism for Cel SCI PIII
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CVM News