Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:33:28 AM
"sorry I must say this"
'you just realized now that there is a potential for such dilution'?
That - IMO - has been the subject of many (and more) posts"
NO, I'm not a new-be! I know you said it in jest.It is a far gone conclusion that the intention is to nullify current owners sake in these companies. To what extent is Treasury going to dilute stakeholders is the issue.
There are two options IMHO.
1.- Retain the 79.9% Warrants and re-market it as a secondary offering.
2. Disregard the Warrants, and just issue new shares to shore up the capital.
Both options stick it to the current shareholders. My point is that the Warrants are more toxic to Treasury and downright deadly to current holders. If Gov't insists on exercising the Warrants, we'll be in litigation purgatory for the next 10 years.
Option 2 is dangerous as well, since we do not know how far the dilution will cut into our equity.
It's hard to keep up with all the opinions on this board as everyone is all-in with remarks and rebuttals. Healthy, but time consuming. All the best.
FEATURED POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Short Term Department of Defense Contract Wins Will Exceed $1,100,000 for the current Quarter • BANT • Jun 25, 2024 10:00 AM
ECGI Holdings Targets $9.7 Billion Equestrian Apparel Market with Allon Brand Launch • ECGI • Jun 25, 2024 8:36 AM
Avant Technologies Addresses Progress on AI Supercomputer-Driven Data Centers • AVAI • Jun 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Expands International Presence with New Partnership in Dubai • GRLF • Jun 24, 2024 8:30 AM