Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:33:28 AM
"sorry I must say this"
'you just realized now that there is a potential for such dilution'?
That - IMO - has been the subject of many (and more) posts"
NO, I'm not a new-be! I know you said it in jest.It is a far gone conclusion that the intention is to nullify current owners sake in these companies. To what extent is Treasury going to dilute stakeholders is the issue.
There are two options IMHO.
1.- Retain the 79.9% Warrants and re-market it as a secondary offering.
2. Disregard the Warrants, and just issue new shares to shore up the capital.
Both options stick it to the current shareholders. My point is that the Warrants are more toxic to Treasury and downright deadly to current holders. If Gov't insists on exercising the Warrants, we'll be in litigation purgatory for the next 10 years.
Option 2 is dangerous as well, since we do not know how far the dilution will cut into our equity.
It's hard to keep up with all the opinions on this board as everyone is all-in with remarks and rebuttals. Healthy, but time consuming. All the best.
Maybacks Global Entertainment and ZEASN Technology Private Ltd. Sign Global Licensing Agreement • AHRO • Aug 8, 2024 7:00 AM
SANUWAVE Will Host a Conference Call on August 13, 2024 at 8:30 AM (ET) to Present Q2 Financial Results • SNWV • Aug 8, 2024 6:59 AM
Kona Gold Beverage Inc. Signs Letter of Intent with Bemax, Inc. to Sell Kona Gold, LLC • BMXC • Aug 7, 2024 10:00 AM
Btab Ecommerce Group, Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • BBTT • Aug 7, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces Preliminary Unaudited Second Quarter 2024 Financial Results and Provides Business Update • HYDI • Aug 7, 2024 8:52 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Startup, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 5, 2024 9:00 AM