UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[AllinFun]

I haven't viewed the filing yet and I will but frankly it's a waste of time in my opinion because it's very unlikely they get anywhere with this continuous crying that costs them nothing to continue to try to delay the case in anyway possible. Everyone knows they are a hired gun trying to keep their image up being that they had never lost an IPR prior to this case. Everyone knows that this is unlimited attempts to drag this out longer and give the defendant maybe another glimmer of hope to delay the case further pending a review on their IPR.

I just want to make sure you realize that RPX lost their IPR attempt and failed horribly. They then went to the Federal Circuit, after requesting a review and failing with the PTAB, claiming they were suffering damages because they had to pay for the IPR that they lost. So let's think of the logic there and WHY the Federal Circuit laughed at their attempt for a review - you paid to file an IPR because you were paid by a client to do so and fight the tech patents (that is their entire business model if you didn't already know). Therefore you were paid monies to fight a case and you lost that case. You don't just pay to file with the PTAB and then automatically win because you paid monies... It's a risk that you take and you might lose.

Not to mention they were deemed NOT a real-interest party by both the PTAB and Federal Circuit. Why you may ask? Because they are not involved in the case. They were hired to bring the patent's validity in question and did so and failed. They are not a named defendant in the case and in fact they said themselves they have nothing to do with any defendant in any pending case in regards to these patents (We can make that bet any day if you would like). I appreciate your opinions and views however, I urge you to read into the PTAB's rules and procedures for filing an appeal after suffering a loss in the IPR process. Then maybe you'll see why the Federal Circuit sided with the PTAB. They can continue to cry all they want but it's easy to see through their bullshit and it's also easy to deny something when all legal procedures are laid out in our favor here.

RPX has been a dead dog being drug through the mud for a long time - yet somehow this board continues to let them rise as some sort of issue going forward. Even if they somehow got a review - they then need to go back to the PTAB with a better case to get any success. Goodluck - CISCO failed to do so how many times over? And the defendants still fail to find a theory that can be used as a viable argument against these patents.

Some point or another people will start to face reality with these gems.

BTW you do realize the Solicitor General was requested to present his opinion on this writ of certorari and he made the move and declaration to deny RPX of a chance of review. Solicitor General being requested and siding with us is basically the writing on the wall - so 33% rate of success here is way high. Try less than 5%.